Cars Q&A
Hi,
Among the two Skoda Laura scores better than Civic in terms of performance, boot space etc.There wil be no much troubles inmaintenance of the car considering frequency of problems arising.However the only disadvantage of Skoda maintenance is waiting period for some of the parts.The Honda Civic has better service back up.Price of spares of both are almost in the same range.In overall Skoda Laura has better value for money invested provided you have alternative car when the Laura is left for service.Recommeded to check the review on New Civic .
umm see if you look all over sporty than go for civic and looking for gentleness than must go for skoda however as shiva told it is right that you have to wait some time for spare parts
but i want to give you one more advice also try for toyota corolla it is ever best in maintainence and also cool looking car
Ifeel Skoda Laura would be a better buy..Has a very comfy drive with good ground clearance.. As far as maintenance is concerned not much of difference in both the cars. Good Highway cruiser..No comparison between European and Japanese or Kprean models... I recommend u weigh the pros and cons of both and then take a decision.
Its a very close race. Laura has better road presence and the Turbo charged petrol should be superior than Civic. Civic looses some points in terms of its Ground clearance. Go for the Laura, Its a better bet.
hey thanx guys for ur comments and suggestion and what about the milage if any 1 have any idea about NEW LAURA and i dun mind considering COROLLA ALTIS also. i jus want to knw the milage of the cars mentioned above if any one have an idea.
-
Iam sale my kidney your hospital is possible16 mins ago; 0 answers
-
I want to sell my kidney3 hrs ago; 0 answers
-
Kidney seller contact me now Dr Rajeev 74487792803 hrs ago; 0 answers
-
Kidney seller contact me now Dr Rajeev 74487792803 hrs ago; 0 answers
